[ED 256 Challenge Paper] Communication in Science Policy

The below is the challenge paper for ED 256: Technology and Learning. It proposes several challenges of learning in science policy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technology is becoming an increasingly important and integral part of our everyday lives. Although the public has generally positive views of science and research [1], it is often skewed, misinformed, or incomplete. A recent study from the Pew Research Center lists several hot-topic issues such as genetically modified foods, climate change, and vaccinations where perceptions of the public and scientists differ significantly [1]. While it is not necessary for policy and science to perfectly align, it is essential that public understanding and policy reflect informed decision-making.

Currently, there is a gap between what the public perceives and what researchers perceive. Closing this gap is necessary. The relationship between the public and science and research is mutual. As research provides the groundwork for future technologies used everyday, the public provides part of the sway on government funding for research. Possible reasons for this gap include:

·      Insufficiencies in our education system for STEM subjects. This can range from elementary school, when children are first engaged in science, to the university level.

·      The lack of science in public policy in different levels of government. Although there have been increasing efforts to include scientists in public policy making, many of these positions require a doctorate to pursue. This also extends to current legislators-from who key legislation with extensive future impacts is being passed.

·      The perception from science and research. This is challenge is three-fold.

o   Making science accessible and transparent.

Researchers often think that explaining their own work to non-scientists is not worth the effort because it is too “complex”, there is too much jargon, or it is “geeky.” This challenge is how to engage scientists to be proactive advocates of their own research.

o   Making outreach transparent.

Other times researchers do not engage in public outreach either because they believe it will detract from their work or they do not know how.  This challenge is how to better inform scientists of why one should do outreach and how.

o   Normalizing the culture of science policy.

Similarly, scientists often perceive with a wary eye being engaged in policy, thinking of the prototypical corrupt politician. This challenge is to better inform scientists the opportunities and work done in science policy.

[1] C. Funk and L. Rainie. "Public and Scientist's Views on Science and Society." 29 January 2015. Pew Research Center.  Accessed 16 April 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/.